Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
- Pardeep Kumar
- N. K. Pathania
- Nageswer Singh
- Shivani Rana
- Viplove Negi
- Amar Singh
- S. K. Upadhyay
- Desh Raj
- Binny Vats
- Sunandini Kachru
- Usha Rana
- Mamta Kumari
- Vidyasagar
- Vibhuti Sharma
- Pawan Kumar Sharma
- N. D. Negi
- Manpreet Kaur
- Shilpa
- Akhilesh Sharma
- Neelam Bhardwaj
- Tariq
- Vishal Dogra
- Muhammad Juma
- Shilpa .
- Vandana Thakur
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Sharma, Parveen
- Evaluation of Lettuce Genotypes for Yield and Quality under Protected Conditions of Northwestern Himalayas
Abstract Views :144 |
PDF Views:12
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, IN
2 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, IN
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, IN
2 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 41, No 2 (2015), Pagination: 184-188Abstract
Lettuce is a popular salad vegetable in European countries. In India its demand is also increasing. It is not possible to grow salad vegetables under open environmental conditions due to vagaries of weather. The state government in Himachal Pradesh (India) is promoting polyhouse cultivation in a very big way. But the lack of suitable cultivars under polyhouse conditions is the biggest challenge to the growers of the hilly state. Therefore, in the present study seven genotypes of lettuce viz. Red Butter Head (G1), Ice-berg (G2), Revolution (G3), Dublin (G4), Garishma (G5), Bergamo (G6) and Green Romaine (G7) were evaluated in a 36 x 6 m modified naturally ventilated polyhouse having fan pad system. Maximum gross weight (826.6 g/plant) was recorded in G2 which was statistically at par with G4 (791.6 g/plant). Minimum gross weight per plant was found in G7 (18836 g). Maximum net weight/plant was recorded in G7 (631.3 g) which was statistically at par with G2 (578.3 g), G4 (583.6 g), G5 (458.6 g) and G6 (480.3 g). Lettuce genotypes also varied in quality parameters viz. chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll, starch, reducing, non-reducing and total sugars and sodium content.Keywords
Lettuce, Polyhouse, Protected Cultivation, Salad Vegetable.- Vegetable Grafting:A Boon to Vegetable Growers to Combat Biotic and Abiotic Stresses
Abstract Views :221 |
PDF Views:4
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176062, IN
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 41, No 1 (2015), Pagination: 1-5Abstract
Grafting is an alternative approach used in vegetable production to fight against soil-borne diseases such as Fusarium wilt, bacterial wilt and nematodes since 1920s in Japan and Korea. Grafting as a technology for the commercial production was later on adopted by many countries in Europe, Middle East, Northern Africa, Central America and other parts of Asia. For the production of many fruit-bearing vegetables which include watermelon, cucumber, melon, tomato, eggplant and pepper, grafted seedlings were used. These seedlings besides providing resistance against biotic/abiotic stresses, increase the yield of the cultivars. This technique is considered eco-friendly for sustainable vegetable production because the resistant ischolar_mainstock reduces dependence on agrochemicals. Grafting improves quality of the plant and is used to induce resistance against low and high temperatures. Growth, yield and fruit quality of the scion is greatly influenced by the type of ischolar_mainstock used. Due to high post graft mortality of seedlings, this technology is still in infancy in India. For its commercial application in India, sharpening of grafting skills and healing environment need to be standardized.Keywords
Grafting, Advantages, Methods, Basic Pre-Requisites, Precautions.- Evaluation of Different Rootstocks for Bacterial Wilt Tolerance in Bell Pepper [Capsicum annuum (L.) Var. grossum (Sendt.)] under Protected Conditions
Abstract Views :141 |
PDF Views:3
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur 176 062, IN
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur 176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 41, No 1 (2015), Pagination: 100-103Abstract
Bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L. var. grossum Sendt.) is an important commercial crop grown under protected condition in Himachal Pradesh. Being long duration under protected environment, it is the principle money spinner off-season crop. Production of bell pepper under protected conditions in the state is very low as compared to the National and International levels because of lack of suitable Cultivars and hybrids resistant to bacterial wilt. Among biotic stresses bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum is the most devastating disease under protected as well as open field conditions in mid hills of HP which reduces yield of capsicum to very low levels. Numerous attempts have been made to develop bacterial wilt resistant varieties, but till date no resistant hybrid is available. The best option to overcome this problem is grafting scions of horticulturally superior hybrids on resistant ischolar_mainstocks. The study revealed that chilli ischolar_mainstock PI-201232 was the most suitable bacterial wilt resistant ischolar_mainstock of bell pepper whereas; brinjal ischolar_mainstocks were not suitable for bell pepper scions.Keywords
Bell Pepper, Grafting, Rootstock, Scion, Bacterial Wilt, Protected Cultivation.- Graft Compatibility Studies in Interspecific Tomato-Potato Grafts
Abstract Views :191 |
PDF Views:5
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
2 Department of Plant Pathology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
2 Department of Plant Pathology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 42, No 1 (2016), Pagination: 29-31Abstract
An inter-specific tomato-potato graft study was undertaken in a naturally ventilated quonset polyhouse at Palampur during the autumn and winter seasons 2015. The treatments comprised of combination of two tomato hybrids [Avtar-7711 (S1) and GS-600 (S2)] as scions, three potato cultivars viz. Kufri Himsona (V1), Kufri Himalini (V2) and Kufri Giriraj (V3) as ischolar_mainstocks and two grafting methods viz. tongue grafting (G1) and cleft grafting (G2). GS-600 tongue grafted on Kufri Himalini (V2G1S2) resulted in maximum survival of grafted plants (93.25%) as well as grafting success rate (81.68%). Kufri Himalini (V2) was found to be the best ischolar_mainstock for tomato scions which gave 2 maximum survival of grafted plants (87.89%) as well as grafting success rate (76.59%). Cleft grafting (G2) resulted in maximum survival of grafted plants (84.13%) and grafting success rate (72.95%). Tomato scion GS-600 (S2) was found to be the best scion for potato ischolar_mainstocks which resulted in a significantly higher survival of grafted plants (85.72%) and grafting success rate (73.85%) as well. Kufri Himalini+GS- 600 was the best ischolar_mainstock-scion combination giving maximum survival of grafted plants and grafting success rate irrespective of the grafting methods used. It is also concluded from the study that irrespective of the ischolar_mainstocks and grafting methods employed, scion GS-600 (S2 always had better survival in grafted plants and a significantly higher grafting success rate at least for the three best performing treatments and grafting tomato on potato plants in compatible combinations had a significant impact on their survival.Keywords
Pomato, Vegetable Grafting, Graft Compatibility, Inter-Specific Grafting, Solanaceae.References
- Brandt GR and Kollmann R. 1992. Studies on graft unions IV: Assimilate transport and sieve element restitution in homo and heterografts. Journal of Plant Physiology 139 (5): 579-583.
- Maharana T, Pati PN and Sahu GS. 1986. Effect of time of grafting in tomato-potato grafts. Advances in Horticulture and Forestry 4: 91-94.
- Maharana T, Pati PN and Sahu GS. 1990. Effect of growth regulators and micronutrients on growth and yield of potato-tomato grafts. Environment and Ecology 8 (4): 1327-1328
- Peres LEP, Carvalho RF, Zsogon A, Bermudez-Zambrano OD, Robles WGR and Tavares S. 2005. Grafting of tomato mutants onto potato ischolar_mainstocks: An approach to study leaf-derived signaling on tuberization. Plant Science 169: 680-688.
- Trudgill DL and Thompson R. 1987. The influence of stock and of scion on the growth and yield of potato plants produced by grafting cultivars of different maturity types. Potato Research 30 (2): 285-300.
- Tsror L and Nachmias A. 1995. Significance of the ischolar_main system in Verticillium wilt tolerance in potato and resistance in tomato. Israel Journal of Plant Science 43 (4): 315-323.
- Effect of Indole Butyric Acid (IBA), Cow Urine and Growing Media on Root Formation in Tomato Stem Cuttings
Abstract Views :187 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
2 Department of Biology & Environmental Sciences, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
3 Department of Horticulture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
2 Department of Biology & Environmental Sciences, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
3 Department of Horticulture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 43, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 40-43Abstract
An experiment was conducted to study the response of growing media and various concentrations of IBA and cow urine on ischolar_main parameters viz., number of days to ischolar_main initiation, number of ischolar_mains per cutting, ischolar_main length (cm) and survival percentage of the stem cuttings (%). Root formation was significantly earlier in the cuttings treated with RH1C2G2 (RHl = IBA, C2 = 100 ppm and G2 = SoU) and CUCIGI (CU = Cow urine, Cl = 5% and G1 = SoiUess) i.e. 4.67 days than the non treated tomato stem cuttings. Maximum number of ischolar_mains per cutting (27.67) and longer ischolar_main length (8.73 cm) were obtained from treatment RH1C3G2 (RHl = IBA, C3 = 150 ppm and G2 = Soil). All treatments showed a significant increase in all the ischolar_main parameters except survival percentage of the stem cuttings (%).Keywords
IBA, Cow Urine, Tomato, Stem Cuttings, Rooting.References
- Acha lA, Shiwachi H, Asiedu R and Akoroda MO. 2004. Effect of auxins on ischolar_main development in yam (Dioscorea rotundata) vine. Tropical Science 44 (2): 80-84.
- Agele SO, Ayankanmi TG and Kikuno H. 2010. Effects of synthetic hormone substitutes and genotypes on ischolar_maining and mini tuber production of vines cuttings obtained from white yam (Dioscorea rotundata, Poir). Airican Journal of Biotechnology 9 (30): 4714-4724.
- Ali A, Ahmad T, Abbasi NA and Hafiz lA. 2009. Effect of different concentrations of auxins on in vitro ischolar_maining of olive cultivar 'Moraiolo'. The Pakistan Journal of Botany41 (3): 1223-1231.
- Jandaik S, Thakur P and Kumar V. 2015. Efficacy of cow urine as plant growth enhancer and antifimgal agent. Advances in Agriculture 1-7.
- Jasim AH and Abed HM. 2013. Effect of some treatments on ischolar_maining of cucumber cuttings (Cucumis sativus L.). Euphrates Journal of Agriculture Science 5 (4): 11 -16.
- Javier RR and Mamicpic NG. 1978. The effect of growth regulators on ischolar_main and shoot production and on yield of cassava {Manihot esculenta, Crantz). The Philippines Journal of Crop Sciences3 (2): 90-102
- Nizam-ud-din, Mirza B, Qamar M and Khabir A. 2005. Root formation in true potato seed parental lines by IBA application. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 42 (3-4): 29-35.
- Shinde W and Malshe KV. 2015. Effect of cattle urine and cow dung slurry as seed treatment on germination and growth of Khimi (Manilkara hexandra L.). Journal of Eco-friendly Agriculture 10 (2): 128-130.
- Waheed A, Hamid FS, Ahmad H, Abbassi FM, Aslam S, Shah AH, Ahmad N, Naheed Z, Ah H and Khan N. 2015. Effect of indole butyric acid (IBA) on early ischolar_main formation (tomato “Sahil” hybrid) cuttings. Journal of Materials and Environmental Science 6 (1): 272-279.
- Studies On Stigma Receptivity and Fruit Load for Hybrid Seed Production in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) under Protected Environment
Abstract Views :174 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 43, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 44-47Abstract
An experiment was conducted in factorial randomized block design with three replications during spring-summer season 2013 at Experimental Farm, Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur to standardize the best time of stigma receptivity and optimum fruit load in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) The data indicated that for hybrid seed production of tomato under polyhouse conditions, the pollination carried out between 9.00 to 10.00 am and retaining fruit load of 20 fruits per plant, exhibited higher fruit set (65.1%), average fruit weight (64.2g), 1000-seed weight (4.20g), average seed weight per fruit (0.17g), fruit yield per plant (1496.7g), seed yield per plant (4.54g) and seed quality parameters such as germination (91.7%) and seedling vigour index (1943) as compared to the pollinations done before and after this time and retaining fruit load of 25 or 30 fruits per plant.Keywords
Tomato, Emasculation, Pollination Time, Stigma Receptivity, Seed Quality.References
- Abdul-Baki AA and Anderson JE.1973. Vigour determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop Science 13; 630-635.
- Abhishekkatagi, Tirakannanvar S, Jagadeesha RC, Jayappa J, Gasti VD and Shankarappa KS. (2013). Studies on emasculation and pollination time in hybrid seed production of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench). Annals of Horticulture 6(2): 291-297.
- Anonymous. 1999. International rules for seed testing. Seed Science and Technology 32:1-334.
- Gomez KA and Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons, pp 644-645.
- Kivadasannavar P, Deshpande VK, ^akaranahal BS, Mohankumar HD and Lambani KD. 2009. Effect of emasculation and pollination time in hybrid seed production in chillies (Capsicum annuum L.). Proceedings of National Workshop "Current Trends and Future Prospects Production Export Spice Crops With Special Reference to Chillies" February 27-28 CSS-NHM Project. Division of Horticulture. MARS. University of Agricultural Science Dharwad.
- Kumar S, Vyakaranahal BS, Palled YB, Dharmatti PR and Patil MS. 2008. Studies on crossing ratio and pollination time in tomato hybrid seed Production (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.). Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 21(1): 30-34.
- Performance of Grafted Tomato for Horticultural and Quality Traits under Polyhouse Conditions
Abstract Views :193 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Vibhuti Sharma
1,
Pardeep Kumar
1,
Parveen Sharma
1,
Amar Singh
2,
Pawan Kumar Sharma
3,
N. D. Negi
4
Affiliations
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur - 176 062, IN
2 Department of Pathology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur - 176 062, IN
3 Department of Entomology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur - 176 062, IN
4 Department of Horticulture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur - 176 062, IN
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur - 176 062, IN
2 Department of Pathology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur - 176 062, IN
3 Department of Entomology, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur - 176 062, IN
4 Department of Horticulture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur - 176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 44, No 1&2 (2018), Pagination: 54-59Abstract
Present investigation was carried out for two successive years i.e. 2016-17 and 2017-18 to study the performance of grafted tomato with respect to growth, yield and quality of tomato under polyhouse conditions at Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSKHPKV, Palampur. Sixteen different ischolar_mainstocks of tomato were grafted with scion cultivar 'GS-600'. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Block Design with three replications and cleft grafting method was used. Plants grafted on ischolar_mainstock LS-89 proved superior to other ischolar_mainstocks for days to first flowering and days to first harvest. For prolonged harvest duration plants grafted on tomato ischolar_mainstock Green Gourd found superior. Higher yield in terms of number of marketable fruits per plant, marketable fruit yield per plant and marketable fruit yield per square metre in were recorded plants grafted on tomato ischolar_mainstock Green Gourd.Keywords
Rootstocks, Scion, Number of Marketable Fruits Per Plant, Fruit Yield Per Plant, Fruit Yield Per Square Metre.References
- Alvarado MJV, Ortiz RL, Zaval JJG, Brindis RC, Izquierdo SC, Torres TC and Mariano MKM. 2017. Mexican native tomatoes as ischolar_mainstock to increase yield. Chilean Journal of Agriculture Research 77 (3): 187-193.
- He C, Poysa V and Yu K. 2003. Development and characterization of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers and their use in determining relationships among Lycopersicon esculentum cultivars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106: 363-373.
- Ibrahim A, Wahb-Allah Abdel, M Razzak, H A and Alsadon. 2014. Growth, yield, quality and water use efficiency of grafted tomato plants grown in greenhouse under different irrigation levels. Journal of Life Sciences 11: 118–126.
- Khiareddine HF, Abdallah, RAB, Remadi MD, Nefzi A and Ayed F. 2019. Grafting tomato cultivars for soilborne disease suppression and plant growth and yield improvement. Journal of Plant Pathology and Microbiology 10: 2-8.
- Kumar P, Sharma P and Vats B. 2018. Influence of ischolar_mainstocks and scions on horticultural traits and quality of tomato under protected conditions. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10 (2): 5085-5087.
- Kyriacou MC, Rouphael Y, Colla G, Zrenner R and Schwarz D. 2017 Vegetable Grafting: The Implications of a Growing Agronomic Imperative for Vegetable Fruit Quality and Nutritive Value. Frontiers in Plant Science 741 (8): 1-23.
- Miskovic A, Ilic O, Bacanovic J, Vujasinovic V and Kukic B. 2016. Effect of eggplant ischolar_mainstock on yield and quality parameters of grafted tomato. Acta Scientiarium Polonorum – Hortus Cultus 15(6): 149-159.
- Velkov N and Pevicharova. 2016. Effects of cucumber grafting on yield and fruit sensory characteristics. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 10: 405-410.
- Breeding Vegetables for Protected Cultivation: A Review
Abstract Views :75 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
2 Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, IN
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
2 Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 47, No 1 (2021), Pagination: 1-17Abstract
Protected cultivation of vegetable crops was given a high priority and developed very rapidly during the past 15 years in India. Initially, vegetable cultivars commonly used for open field production were also started to grown under protected conditions. Despite various measures, many problems arose due to unfavorable ecological conditions in protected environments. Since the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, breeding of vegetable cultivars for protected conditions has been carried out by taking advantages of both conventional methods and biotechnological tools. One of the main research efforts include screening and evaluation of breeding materials for tolerance to various biotic and abiotic stresses. Another effort focused on the creation and development of new breeding materials (variety, cultivar or breeding line) for protected conditions by selection, introduction, crossing and biotechnological methods, including isolating from popular F genotypes, wide crosses, tissue and 1 cell culture, protoplast regeneration, gene transfer techniques, molecular marker assisted breeding and many other approaches. As most hydroponic cultivation and grafting tools are carried out inside the protected conditions, more cultivars adapted to this type of culture are also urgently needed.Keywords
Breeding, Grafting, Hydroponic, Protected Cultivation, Vegetable.References
- Adetula OA. 2006. Genetic diversity of Capsicum using random amplified polymorphic DNAs. African Journal of Biotechnology 5: 120-22.
- Allard RW. 1960. Principles of Plant Breeding. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, 485pp.
- Altunlu H and Gul A. 2012. Increasing drought tolerance of tomato plants by grafting. Acta Horticulture 960: 18390. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.960.26
- Anonymous. 2018. Economy of India. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy of India.
- Baille A. 2001. Trends in greenhouse technology for improved climate control in mild winter climates. Acta Hortulture 559 : 161-67. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.559.23.
- Balashov ES. 2006. Features of growth and development of new tomato hybrids under cultivation in the extended cycle of winter glazed greenhouse. Ph D thesis, AllRussian Research Institute of Vegetable Growing, Moscow.
- Bhardwaj A. 2017. Development of parthenocarpic gynoecious lines in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) for protected cultivation. Ph D thesis, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur.
- Bhatt RM, Upreti KK, Divya MH, Bhat S, Pavithra CB and Sadashiva AT. 2015. Interspeciûc grafting to enhance physiological resilience to flooding stress in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Scientia Horticulture 182: 8-17.
- Bosland PW and Votava EJ. (Eds), 2012. Peppers. In: Vegetable and Spice Capsicums J. Atherton and A. Rees (Eds.), CABI Publishing, 19999.
- Campbell RN and Grogan RC. 1963. Big-vein virus of lettuce and its transmission by Olpidium brassicae. Phytopathology 53: 252-59.
- Castilla N, Hernandez J and Abou-Hadid AF. 2004. Strategic crop and greenhouse management in mild winter climate areas. Acta Horticulture 633: 183-96. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.633.22
- Chandra P, Sirohi PS, Behera TK and Singh AK. 2000. Cultivating vegetables in polyhouse. Indian Horticulture 45: 17-25.
- Cheema DS, Singh N and Jindal SK. 2013. Evaluation of indeterminate tomato hybrids for fruit, yield and quality traits under net house and open field conditions. Vegetable Science 40: 45-49.
- Chen HX and Cao PS. 1994. Parthenocarpy of cucumber. China Vegetable 3: 56-59.
- Davis AR, Perkins-Veazie P, Hassell R, Levi A, King SR and Zhang X. 2008. Grafting effects on vegetable quality. Horticulture Science 43: 1670-72.
- Dhaliwal MS and Jindal SK. 2017. Development of Cherry tomato variety from interspecific cross (Solanum lycopersicum and Solanum pimpinellifoilium) for protected cultivation. Agriculture Research Journal 54: 182-187.
- Dinuba CA, Singh DK and Tewari D. 2009. Polyhouse breeding of tomato. Agropedia http://agropedia.iitk.ac.in/content/polyhouse-breedingtomato.
- Epstein L, Kaur S, Chang P, Carrasquilla-Garcia N, Lyu G, Cook D, Subbarao K and O’Donnell K. 2017. Races of the celery pathogen. Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. apii are polyphyletic. Phytopathology 107: 463-73. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-04-16-0174-R
- FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization). 2013. Good agricultural practices for greenhouse vegetable Crops.
- FAO plant production and protection paper. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
- Feng C, Correll JC, Kammeijer KE and Koike ST. 2014. Identification of new races and deviating strains of the spinach downy mildew pathogen. Peronospora
- farinose f. sps pinaciae. Plant Disease 98: 145-52. doi: 10.1094/pdis-04-13-0435-re.
- Feng C, Saito K, Liu B, Manley A, Kammeijer K, Mauzey SJ, Koike S and Correll JC. 2018. New races and novel strains of the spinach downy mildew pathogen Peronospora effuse. Plant Disease 102: 613-18. doi: 10.1094/pdis-05-17-0781-re.
- Flores FB, Sanchez-Bel P, Estan MT, Morales B, Campos JF and Egea MI. 2010. The effectiveness of grafting to improve tomato fruit quality. Scientia Horticulture 125: 211-17. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.scienta.2010.03.026.
- Foolad MR. 2007. Genome mapping and molecular breeding of tomato. International Journal of Plant Genomics, 64358. doi:10.1155/2007/64358.
- Garibaldi A, Baudino M, Minuto A and Gullino ML. 2008. Effectiveness of fumigants and grafting against tomato brown root rot caused by Colletotrichum coccodes. Phytoparasitica 36: 483-88.
- Gavrish SF. 2015. Modern hybrids tomato and cucumber. Gavrish 4: 25.
- Gazquez JC, Perez C, Meca DE, Segura MD, Domene MA, Lopez JC and Buendia D. 2017. Evaluation of different training systems and crop densities to increase greenhouse tomato rocution and profitablility in the Mediterranean area. Acta Horticulture 1170: 777-82. doi: 10.17660/acta horticulture.2017.1170.99
- Gilardi G, Colla P, Pugliese M, Baudino M, Gullino ML and Garibaldi A. 2014. Control of Colletotrichum coccodes on tomato by grafting and soil amendments. Journal of Phytopathology 162: 116-23. doi: 10.1111/jph.12162
- Goncharova NA, Van Der VA and Verstegen JAAM. 2004. Changes in horticulture sector in the Netherlands. Acta Horticulture 655: 319-31. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2004.655.39
- Green SK. 1986. Virus disease of tomato and Chinese cabbage in Taiwan and source of resistance. Plant virus diseases of horticultural crops in the tropics & subtropics. AVRDC , pp.71-83.
- Greenleaf WH. 1986. Pepper Breeding. In: Breeding Vegetable Crops, Westport, USA, AVI Publishing Co., pp 67-134.
- Heuberger H, Praeger U, Georgi M, Schirrmacher G, Grabmann J and Schnitzler WH. 2004. Precision stressing by UV-B rafiation to improve quality of spinach under protected cultivation. Proc. VII IS on Prot Cult Mild Winter Climates (Eds. Cantliffe D J, Stoffella P J and Shaw N) Acta Horticulture 659, 20106.
- Hochmuth GJ and Hochmuth R. 2009. Blossom-end rot in bell pepper: causes and prevention. SL 284, Institute of Food and Agriculture Science, University of Florida, pp. 5.
- Hou F, Wenyun C, Zhenrong H, Shuju L and Dehua M. 1995. New cucumber variety for sunlight greenhouse cultivation - Jinchun No. 3. China Vegetable 2: 6-8.
- Irish BM, Correll JC, Feng C, Bentley T and De Los Reyes BG. 2008. Characterization of a resistance locus (Pfs1) to the spinach downy mildew pathogen (Peronospora farinosef.spspinaciae) and development of a molecular marker linked to Pfs-1. Phytopathology 98: 894-900. doi: 10.1094/phyto-98-8-0894
- Jang Y, Yang E, Cho M, Um Y, Ko K, Chun C. 2012. Effect of grafting on growth and incidence of Phytophthora blight and bacterial wilt of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Horticulture Environment and Biotechnology 53: 9-19. doi: 10.1007/s13580-012-0074-7
- Janick J. 1986. Horticultural Science (4th Edn), Freeman WH and Co., New York, USA, pp 339-46.
- Joshi S and Berke T. 2005. Perspectives of bell pepper breeding. Journal of new seeds 6: 51-74. doi: 10.1300/J153v06n02_04.
- Kacira M. 2011. Greenhouse production in US: status, challenges, and opportunities. In: Presented at CIGR 2011 conference on sustainable bioproduction, Tokyo.
- Kalia P. 2005. Precision protected vegetable cultivation. In: Hi Tech Farming in Vegetable Crops. CAFT in Horticulture (Vegetables), YSP UHF, Nauni, Solan, pp 18-21.
- Kalloo G, Banerjee MK, Kumar S and Prakash C. 2000. Hybrid vegetable technology in India- An overview. In: Kalloo G and Singh K. (Eds.), Emerging Scenario in Vegetable Research and Development. Research Periodicals and Book Publishing House, India, 11-31 pp.
- Karlsson M. 2016. Growing Cucumber in greenhouses. University of Alaska Fairbanks.
- Kim S, Park M and Yeom SI. 2014. Genome sequence of the hot pepper provides insights into the evolution of pungency in Capsicum species. Nature Genetics 46: 271-78. doi: 10.1038/ng.2877
- King SR, Davis AR, Liu W and Levi A. 2008. Grafting for disease resistance. Hort Science 43: 1673-76. doi: 10.21273/hortsci.43.6.1673.
- Kohli UK, Amit V, Manish K and Dohroo NP. 2010. Strategy for production of Exotic vegetables in India. In: Exotic Vegetables. Westville Publishing House, New Delhi. pp 120.
- Kubota C, Mcclure MA, Kokalis-Burelle N, Bausher MG and Rosskopf EN. 2008. Vegetable grafting: History, use, and current technology status in North America. Hort Science 43: 1664-69. doi: 10.21273/hortsci.43.6.1664
- Kumar PY, Rouphael M, Cardarelli G and Colla G. 2017. Vegetable grafting as a tool to improve drought resistance and water use efûciency. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 1130. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01130
- Kumar S, Gowda P and Mallikarjuna NM. 2015. Evaluation of selected tomato lines for extended shelf life.SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics 47: 32634.
- Kumar S, Kumar R, Kumar D, Gautam N, Dogra RK and Mehta DK. 2016. Parthenocarpicgynoecious parental lines of cucumber introduced from Netherlands for developing high-yielding, quality hybrids. Journal of crop improvement 30: 352-69. doi: 10.1080/ 5427528.2016.1163762
- Kunwar S, Paret ML, Olson SM, Ritchie L, Rich JR, Freeman JH and Mcavoy T. 2015. Grafting root stocks with resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum against Meloidogyne incognita in tomato production. Plant Disease 99: 119-24. doi: 10.1094/pdis-09-13-0936-re
- La Malfa G and Leonardi C. 1993. Crop practices and techniques: trends and needs. Acta Horticulture 559: 31-42. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2001.559.1
- Lee JM and Oda M. 2003. Grafting of herbaceous vegetable and ornamental crops. Horticultural Reviews 28: 61124.
- Lee JM, Jahn MM and Yeam I. 2013. Allelic relationships at the pvr1 locus in Capsicum annuum. Euphytica 194: 417-24. doi: 10.1007/s10681-013-0967-2.
- Lee JM, Kubota C, Tsao SJ, Bie Z, Hoyos E, Morra L and Oda M. 2010. Current status of vegetable grafting: diffusion, grafting techniques, automation. Scientia Horticulture 127: 93-105. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.08.003.
- Lenecci MS, Cadinu D, Taurino M, Piro G and Dalessandro G. 2006. Antioxidant composition in cherry and high pigment tomato cultivars. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 54: 2606-13. doi: 10.1021/jf052920c.
- Lin C, Hsu S, Tzeng K and Wang J. 2008. Application of a preliminary screen to select locally adapted resistant rootstock and soil amendment for integrated management of tomato bacterial wilt in Taiwan. Plant Disease 92: 909-916. doi: 10.1094/pdis-92-6-0909
- Lopez-Marin J, Galvez A, Del Amar FM, Albecete A, Fernandez JA, Egea-Gilabert C and Perez-Alfocea F.
- Selecting vegetative/ generative/dwarfing rootstocks for improving fruit yield and quality in water stressed sweet peppers. Scientia Horticulture 214: 9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.11.012.
- Lopez-Marin J, Gonzalez A, Perez-Alfocea F, EgeaGilabert C and Fernandez JA. 2013. Grafting is an efficient alternative to shading screens to alleviate thermal stress in greenhouse-grown sweet pepper. Scientia Horticulture 149: 39-46. doi: 10.1016/ j.scienta.2012.02.034.
- Lopez-Perez JA, Strange ML, Kaloshian I and Ploeg AT. 2006. Differential response of mi gene-resistant tomato rootstocks to root-knot nematodes. (Meloidogyne incognita). Crop Protection 25: 382-88. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2005.07.001
- Martinez-Andujar C, Ruiz-Lozano JM, Dodd IC, Albacete A and Perez-Alfocea F. 2017. Hormonal and nutritional features in contrasting rootstock-mediated tomato growth under low phosphorus nutrition. Frontiers Plant Science: 533. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00533
- Mcavoy T, Paret M, Freeman JH, Rideout S, Olson SM. 2012. Evaluation of grafting using hybrid rootstocks for management of bacterial wilt in ûeld tomato production. Hort Science 47: 621-25. doi: 10.21273/hortsci.47.5.621
- Medina-Filho HP and Stevens MA. 1980. Tomato breeding for nematode resistance: Survey of resistant varieties for horticultural characteristics and genotype of acid phosphates. Acta Horticulture 100: 383-91. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.1980.100.41
- Meng XD, Ma H, Wei M and Xing YX. 1999. Breeding of vegetable crops for protected growing conditions. Acta Horticulture 481: 695-99. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.1999.481.83
- Mero CE. 1983. The inheritance of bolt resistance in an interspecific cross Siberian kale (Brassica napus) x Chinese cabbage (B. campestris ssp. pekinensis) and an intraspecific cross Chinese cabbage x turnip (B. campestris ssp. rapifera), Ph. D. thesis Abstract 44: 701-02.
- Mishra GP, Singh N, Kumar H and Singh SB. 2010. Protected Cultivation for food and nutritional Security at Ladakh. Defence Science Journal 61: 219-25.
- Mishra SN, Sahoo SC, Lotha RE and Mishra RS. 1991. Heterosis and combining ability for seed characters in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 61: 123-25.
- More TA and Budgujar CD. 2002. Isolation of parthenocarpic tropical gynoecious lines in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Acta Horticultural 588: 255-60. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2002.588.39
- More TA and Munger HM. 1986. Gynoecious sex expression and stability in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Euphytica 35 : 899-903. doi: 10.1007/BF00028598
- More TA. 2002. Development and exploitation of tropical gynoecious lines in F hybrid of cucumber. Acta 1 Horticulture 588: 261-267. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.588.40
- Morelock TE and Correll JC. 2005. Spinach breeding in the mid-south. National Spinach Conference, Fayetteville, AR USA, pp14.
- Munshi AD, Kumar R and Panda B. 2007. Heterosis for yield and its component in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Vegetable Science 32: 133-135.
- Nilsen ET, Freeman J, Grene R and Tokuhisa J. 2014. A rootstock provides water conservation for a grafted commercial tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) line in response to mild drought conditions: A focus on vegetative growth and photosynthetic parameters. PLoS One 9 : e115380. doi : 10.1371/journal.pone.0115380
- Niu XK, Leung H and Williams PH. 1984. Sources and nature of resistance to downy mildew and turnip mosaic in Chinese cabbage. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Sciences 108: 115.
- Noll F. 1902. Fruchtbildingohnevorausgegangene bestaubung (parthenokarpie) bei der gurke. Gesellschaft fur Natur-u. Heilkundezu Bonn. 106: 149-62.
- Nuez F. 1986. Solanaceae breeding for protected cultivation. Acta Horticulture 191: 317-30. Doi: 10.17660/ ActaHortic.1986.191.36
- Orton TJ, Durgan ME and Hulbert SH. 1984. Studies on the inheritance of resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. apii in celery. Plant Disease 68: 574.
- Pereira MJZ, Massola JNS, Sussel AAB, Sala FC, Costa CP and Boiteux LS. 2011. Reacao de acessos de Capsicum ede progenies decruz amentosintere specificosaisolados de Colletotrichum acutatum. Hortic Brasileira 29, 569-576. Doi: 10.1590/S010205362011000400021
- Phillips RL. 1999. Research needs in heterosis. In: Coors JG and Pandey S. (eds.), Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops. American Society of AgronomyCrop Science Society of America, pp 501-507.
- Poulos MJ. 1994. Pepper breeding (Capsicum spp.): Achievements, Challenges and Possibilities. Plant Breeding 64: 143-154.
- Quiros CF. 1987. Breeding celery for disease resistance and improved quality, California Celery Research Advisory Board Annual Report. 1986-1987.
- Rajasekar M., Arumugam T and Ramesh KS. 2013. Influence of weather and growing environment on vegetable growth and yield. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry 5: 160-167. doi: 10.5897/jhf2013.0317
- Rivard CL and Louws FJ. 2008. Grafting to manage soil borne diseases in heirloom tomato production. Hort Sc i enc e 43: 2104-2111. doi : 10.21273/hortsci.43.7.2104
- Rivard CL, O’Connell S, Peet MM and Louws FJ. 2010. Grafting tomato with interspeciûc rootstock to manage diseases caused by Sclerotium rolfsii and southern root-knot nematode. Plant Disease 94: 101521. doi: 10.1094/pdis-94-8-1015
- Sanchez-Rodriguez E., Romero L and Ruiz MJ. 2013. Role of grafting in resistance to water stress in tomato plants: Ammonia production and assimilation. Journal of Plant Growth Regulators 32: 831-842. doi: 10.1007/s00344-013-9348-2
- Scott JW, Wang J and Hanson P. 2005. Breeding tomatoes for resistance to bacterial wilt, a global view. International Symposium on Tomato Diseases, Orlando, FL, pp 161-72.
- Serquan FC, Bachar J and Staub JE. 1997. Genetic analysis of yield components in cucumber at low plant density. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science 12: 522-28.
- Singh B. 2012. Protected cultivation of horticultural crops in India: Challenges and opportunities. Agrotechnol 2: 51.
- Singh DK and Peter KV. 2014. Protected cultivation of horticultural crops. New India Publication Agency, New Delhi-110034.
- Singh HP and Malhotra SK. 2012. Current scenario and policy issues for protected cultivation of horticultural crops in India. Proceedings, National Seminar on Protected Cultivation of Vegetables and Flowers-A Value Chain Approach. GBPUAT, Pant Nagar, pp 920.
- Singh S and Bainsha NK. 2015. Analysis of Climate Change Impacts and their Mitigation Strategies on Vegetable Sector in Tropical Islands of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Indian Journal of Horticulture 2: 126.
- Singh T, Singh N, Bahuguna A, Nautiyal M and Sharma VK. 2014. Performance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) hybrids for growth, yield and quality inside polyhouse under mid hill condition of Uttarakhand. American Journal of Drug Discovery Development 4: 202-09.
- Sokova D, Niamoye Y, Paul N, Oligorite A, Aminata D, Kadiadiatou G, Aissata T, Seribakatil E and Doule D. 2013. Overview of pepper (Capsicum sp.) breeding in West Africa. African Journal of Agricultural Research 8: 1108-1114.
- Stephenson AG. 1981. Flower and seed abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12: 253-79.
- Sturtevant EL. 1890. Seedless fruits. Memoirs of the Torrey Botanical Club 1, 141-85.
- Talisha JJA, Sabah SS and Mahmoud MR. 2020. Effects of breeding methods and nitrogen fertilization on growth traits and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) yield under protected conditions. Plant Archives 20: 178-80.
- Tiwari R. 2015. Molecular characterization and genetical studies in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Doctoral Thesis, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India, pp 129.
- Traveset A. 1993. Deceptive fruits reduce insect seed predation in Pistacia terebinthus L. Evolutionary Ecology 7: 357-361.
- Turhan A, Ozmen N, Serbeci MS and Seniz V. 2011. Effects of grafting on different rootstocks on tomato fruit yield and quality. Horticultural Science 38: 142-149.
- Tuzel Y and Leonardi C. 2009. Protected cultivation in Mediterranean region: trends and needs. J Ege Univ Fac Agric 46: 215-223.
- Verdu M and Garcia-Fayos P. 1998. Ecological causes, function, and evolution of abortion and parthenocarpy in Pistacia lentiscus (Anacardiaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 76: 134-41.
- Vrcek IV, Samobor M, Bojic M, Medic-Saric M, Vukobratovic R., Erhatic R, Horvat D and Matota N Z. 2011. The effect of grafting on the antioxidant properties of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 9: 844-851.
- Wani KP, Singh PK, Amin A, Mushtaq F and Dar ZA. 2011. Protected cultivation of tomato, capsicum and cucumber under Kashmir Valley conditions. Asian Journal of Science and Technology 1: 56-61.
- Williamson VM. 1998. Root-knot resistance genes in tomato and their potential for future use. Annual Reviews on Phytopathology 36: 277-93.
- Yuen JE. 1991. Resistance to Peronospora parasitica in Chinese cabbage. Plant Disease 10.
- Effect of Indole Butyric Acid (IBA) and Honey on Root Parameters of Different Sized Stem Cuttings in Bell Pepper
Abstract Views :70 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 47, No 2 (2021), Pagination: 256-259Abstract
Bell pepper has become a major vegetable crop in India and is widely produced under open as well as protected environments and yields remunerative returns. Growing hybrid bell pepper from seed is an expensive affair, hence, there is a need to find out an efficient technique of vegetative propagation of bell pepper plants. Rooting hormone IBA is the most commonly utilized plant hormone for promoting root development and generating new roots in tomato plants propagated through stem cuttings. The analysis of variance revealed that effect of different concentrations of rooting hormone (IBA), and honey on different sized stem cuttings was significant for number of days to root initiation, number of roots per cutting, total root length (cm), root volume (cm3) and survival percentage. A significant impact on the days to root initiation (10.07 days), maximum number of roots per cutting (22.20), increase in root length (166.47cm), highest survival percentage of stem cutting (75%) and maximum root volume (2.20cm3) were observed in treatment RH1C2S3 (RH1=IBA, C2=100 ppm and S3=15cm). All treatments resulted in a considerable improvement in all root parameters.Keywords
IBA, Honey, Bell Pepper, Stem Cuttings, Rooting.References
- Balliu A and Sallaku G. 2017. Exogenous auxin improves root morphology and restores growth of grafted cucumber seedlings. Horticulture. Science (Prague) 44: 82–90.
- Bhore SJ, Nadgauda RS and Gadre RV. 1999. Effect of phytohormones on root elongation of germinating tomato Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. Sun 5715 seedlings. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 37: 102-103.
- EL-Eslamboly AA. 2014. Effect of watermelon propagation by cuttings on vegetative growth, yield and fruit quality. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research 92: 553-579.
- Gomez KA and Gomez AA. 1983. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 357-427.
- Hossain MJ, Khan MAI and Hoque MA. 1998. Effect of IBA and NAA on rooting of potato stems cuttings. Journal of Indian Potato Association 25: 53-56.
- Ibironke O K and O Oyedokun Victor. 2016. Effect of media and growth hormones on the rooting of Queen of Philippines (Mussaenda philippica). Journal of Horticulture 3:1.
- Jasim AH and Abed HM. 2013. Effect of some treatments on rooting of cucumber cuttings (Cucumis sativus L.). Euphrates Journal of Agriculture Science 5: 11-16.
- Kachru S, Kumar P, Sharma P, Rana U and Upadhyay SK. 2017. Effect of indole butyric acid (IBA), cow urine and growing media on root formation in tomato stem cuttings. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 43 (1): 40-43.
- Newman EI. 1966. A method of estimating the total root length of roots in a sample. Journal of Applied Ecology 3: 139-145.
- Nikmatullah A , Ramadhan and Sarjan D. 2018. Growth and yield of apical stem cuttings of white potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) derived from disease-free G0 plants Journal of Applied Horticulture 20 (2): 139-145.
- Nizam-ud-din, Mirza B, Qamar M and Khabir A. 2005. Root formation in true potato seed parental lines by IBA application. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 42: 29-35.
- Waheed A, Hamid FS, Ahmad H, Abbassi FM, Aslam S, Shah AH, Ahmad N, Naheed N, Ali H and Khan N. 2015. Effect of Indole butyric acid (IBA) on early root formation (Tomato “ Sahil” Hybrid) Cuttings. Journal of Materials and Environmental Science 6 (1):272-279.
- Influence of GA and NAA on growth, yield and quality of tomato 3 (Solanum lycopersicum L.)
Abstract Views :63 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 48, No 01 (2022), Pagination: 65-70Abstract
GA and NAA affect various aspects of plant physiology, mainly vegetative, flowering and quality attributes 3 including yield. A field experiment was carried out during 2020-21 at vegetable farm of CSKHPKV, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh to evaluate the effects of foliar-applied plant growth regulators gibberellic acid (GA ) and 3 Naphthalene Acidic Acid (NAA) on tomato hybrid Palam Tomato Hybrid-1. Significant impact of GA and 3 NAA at different concentrations was observed on yield and quality parameters of tomato. Among the different treatments plant growth regulators GA @75 ppm resulted maximum number of fruits per plant, fruit weight 3 and marketable yield per plant, marketable yield per m2 area, ascorbic acid content plant height and minimum number of days to 50 % flowering.Keywords
NAA, GA , protected, tomato, yieldReferences
- Aloni B, Daie J and Wyse RE. 1968. Enhancement of (14C)sucrose export from source leaves of Vicia faba by gibberellic acid. Plant Physiology 82: 962-966.
- Batlang V, VE Emongor, F Pule-Meulenburg. 2006. Effect of benzyladenine and gibberellic acid on yield and yield components of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. cv. ‘tempo’). Journal of Agronomy 5(3):418-423.
- Chaudhary BR, Sharma MD, Shakya SM and Gautam DM. 2006. Effect of plant growth regulators on growth, yield and quality of chilli (Capsicum annum L.) at Rampur, Chitwan. Journal of Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science 27: 65-68.
- Gomez KA and Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons, New York pp 680.
- Kannan K. Jawaharlal M and Prabhu M. 2009. Effect of plant growth regulators on growth and yield parameters of paprika cv. KtPl-19. Agricultural Science Digest 29: 157-162.
- Mehraj H, Sadia AA, Taufique T, Rashid M and Jamal Uddin AFM. 2014. Influence of foliar application of gibberellic acid on cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. Cerasiforme). Journal of Experimental Bioscience 5: 27-30.
- Mostafa EAM and Saleh MMS. 2006. Influence of spraying with gibberellic acid on behavior of anna apple trees. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 2: 477-483.
- Rafeekher M, SA Nair, PN Sorte, GP Hatwal, PM Chandhan. 2002. Effect of growth regulators on growth and yield of summer cucumber. Journal of Soils Crops 12 (1):108-110.
- Ranjeet, Ram RB, Jay P and Meena ML. 2014. Growth, flowering, fruiting, yield and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) as influenced plant bio regulators. International Journal of Plant Science 9: 6771.
- Sood S, Kumar Naveen, Chandel KS and Sharma Parveen. 2011. Determination of genetic variation for morphological and yield traits in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum var. grossum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81(7): 590-594.
- Sun YL and Hong SK. 2010. Effects of plant growth regulators and L-glutamic acid on shoot organogenesis in the halophyte Leymus chinensis (Trin.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture 100:317-328.
- Ujjwal Vivak, Singh Manoj Kumar, Dev Pavitra, Chaudhary Mohit, Kumar Ashish and Tomar Saurabh. 2018. Effect of different levels of GA and NAA on 3 vegetative growth and flowering parameters of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry SP1: 146-148.
- Influence of heterografting on growth and yield characteristics of Pomato grafts
Abstract Views :159 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176062,, IN
2 Department of Plant Sciences, School of Life Sciences Central University of Himachal Pradesh, Dharmshala, IN
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176062,, IN
2 Department of Plant Sciences, School of Life Sciences Central University of Himachal Pradesh, Dharmshala, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 48, No 2 (2022), Pagination: 210-219Abstract
The present study was conducted at Vegetable Research Farm of CSK HPKV, Palampur during the year 2019- 20 and 2020-21. The experimentation was designed in RCBD along with three replications. The data was worked out for various growth and yield of tomato and potato of pomato grafts. The outcomes of the investigation presented that maximum plant height (272.90 cm), number of fruits per cluster (8.20), fruit yield per pant (4.11 kg), tuber yield per square meter (5.44 kg), was calculated for the graft combinations i.e. K. Himalini + Rakshita, K. Himalini + PTH-1, K. Pukhraj + Avtar. Observations from the recorded data also proved that K. Jyoti+ Avtar and K. Jyoti + PTH-1 took minimum number of days for first flowering and days to harvest in case of tomato and potato i.e. 49.70 and 72.04. Hence, these graft combinations can be further recommended to grower, so they can fetch more yield from the limited land holding.Keywords
Pomato, graft combinations, yield, growth, tomato fruits, potato tuber.References
- Arefin SMA, Zeba N, Solaiman AH, Naznin MT, Azad MOK, Tabassum M and Park CH. 2019. Evaluation of compatibility, growth characteristics, and yield of tomato grafted on potato (‘Pomato’). Horticulturae 5 (37): 1-9.
- Bahadur A, Singh AK, Nadeem MA and Singh J. 2020. Pomato: Harnessing twin benefits of potato and tomato grafting. Indian Horticulture pp 30-32.
- Eppakayala K, Pidigam S, Natarajan S, Amarapalli G and Komatireddy RR. 2021. Study of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and yield parameters in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) germplasm. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 10: 768-771.
- Giosanu D, Uleanu F, Trãneci S and Vulpe M. 2020. Aspects regarding the behavior of tomatoes grafted on potatoes. Current Trends in Natural Sciences 9 (17): 205-209.
- Gisbert C, Prohens J, Raigon MD, Stommel JR and Nuez F. 2011. Eggplant relatives as sources of variation for developing new rootstocks: effects of grafting on eggplant yield and fruit apparent quality and composition. Scientia Horticulturae 128:14-22.
- Haberal M, Korpe DA, Iseri OD and Sahin FI. 2016. Grafting tomato onto tobacco rootstocks is a practical and feasible application for higher growth and leafing in different tobacco–tomato unions. Biological, Agriculture & Horticulture 32:248-257.
- Kumar J, Singh N, Dixit PS, Yadav L, Singh BPand Tomar S. 2020. Estimation of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for growth and yield attributes in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Plant Archives 20:503-505.
- Kumar P, Negi V, Sharma P, Raj D, Singh A and Vats B. 2016. Grafting tomato on potato rootstocks and its effect on quality traits. Vegetable Science 43(2):263-365.
- Kumar S, Kumar P, Sharma P, Sankhyan NK and Anjali. 2021. Effect of fertilizers and fertigation treatments on pomato growth and yield under protected environments. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 10 (2): 2813-2820.
- Kumar P, Rana S, Sharma P and Negi V. 2015. Vegetable grafting: A boon to vegetable growers to combat biotic and abiotic stresses. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 41:1-5
- Panchbhaiya A, Singh DK, Verma P and Mallesh S. 2018. Assessment of genetic variability in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Under polyhouse condition for fruit quality and biochemical traits. International Journal of Chemical Studies 6: 245-248.
- Pooja HM, Gasti VD, Bhavidoddi A, Yashvantkumar HK, Prashantha A and Srikantaprasad D. 2022. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in determinate types of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). The Pharma Innovation 11(4): 222-225.
- Rick CM and Chetelat RT. 1995. Utilization of related wild species for tomato improvement. Acta Horticulturae 412: 21-38.
- Sood S, Kumar N, Chandel KS and Sharma P. 2011. Determination of genetic variation for morphological and yield traits in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum var. Grossum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81: 590-594.
- Tessema L, Mohammed W and Abebe T. 2020. Evaluation of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) varieties for yield and some agronomic traits. Open Agriculture 5:63-74.
- Thamburaj S and Singh N. 2016. Textbook of vegetables, tuber crops and spices. Sixth edition. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, pp 26-28.
- Zhang G and Guo H. 2018. Effects of tomato and potato hetero grafting on photosynthesis, quality and yield of grafted parents. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology 60:9-18.
- Performance of parthenocarpic cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) genotypes for yield and quality characters under protected environment
Abstract Views :159 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062,, IN
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062,, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 48, No 2 (2022), Pagination: 220-224Abstract
The experimental material comprises eight parthenocarpic cucumber genotypes to study the comparative performance of these genotypes for yield and quality characteristics under protected environment. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with three replications in spring-summer during 2020 at Vegetable Research Farm, Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur. DDPCG1 and DDPCG4 are good performing genotypes for yield related characters taken under study. Among all genotypes, DDPCG1 had maximum fruit weight, number of fruits per plant and yield/plant. DDPCG4 took minimum days to first fruit picking and maximum harvest duration. Lowest nodal position of first female flower, maximum fruit diameter and vine length were noticed in DDPCG5. Forquality parameters, DDPCG5 had maximum pericarp thickness and TSS.Keywords
Cucumber, gynoecious, protected, quality and yield.References
- Ahirwar CS and Singh DK. 2018. Assessment of genetic variability in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7: 813-22.
- Bhagwat A, Srinivasa V, Bhammanakati S and Shubha AS. 2018. Evaluation of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) genotypes under hill zone of Karnataka, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7: 837-842.
- Choudhary H, Singh DK and Damke SR. 2015. Genetic variability in Cucumis sativus var. hardwickii: key to cucumber improvement. International Journal of Basic and Applied Agricultural Research 13: 340-43.
- Cochran WG and Cox GM. 1963. Experimental Designs. Asia Publishing House, Bombay, 293-316.
- Dingal DK, Patil SS, Birada MS and Mantur SM. 2018. Influence of different protected conditions on growth and yield of parthenocarpic cucumber (Cucumis sativus) hybrids. Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7: 1619-1624.
- Dogra LK. 2012. Genetic evaluation of some hybrids of cucumber under modified naturally ventilated greenhouse in mid hills of Western Himalayas. M.Sc. Thesis, p 92. Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, India.
- Ene CO, Ogbonna PE, Agbo CU and Chukwudi UP. 2016. Studies of phenotypic and genotypic variation in sixteen cucumber genotypes. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 76: 307-313.
- Jakhar RK, Singh AK and Kumawat N. 2016. Yields attributes and yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) cultivars as influenced by growing conditions in arid zone of Rajasthan. Environment and Ecology 34: 2258- 2261.
- Kaur M and Sharma P. 2021. Recent advances in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 97: 3-23.
- Nagamani GV, Kumar JSA, Reddy TBM, Rajesh AM, Amarananjundeswara H, Reddy RLR and Doddabasappa B. 2019. Performance of different parthenocarpic cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) hybrids for yield and yield attributing traits under shade net house. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 8: 978-982.
- Pal S, Sharma HR, Rai AK and Bhardwaj RK. 2017. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic gain for yield and quality traits in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). An International Quarterly Journal of Life Sciences 11: 1985-1990.
- Pushpalatha N, Anjanappa M, Devappa V and Pitchaimuthu M. 2016. Genetic variability and heritability for growth and yield in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Journal of Horticulture Sciences 11: 33-36.
- Ranjan P, Gangopadhyay KK, Bag MK, Roy A, Srivastava R, Bhardwaj R And Dutta M. 2015. Evaluation of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) germplasm for agronomic traits and disease resistance and estimation of genetic variability. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 85: 234 239.
- Shah KN, Rana DK and Singh V. 2018. Evaluation of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) for various quantitative, qualitative and seed characters. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7: 3296- 3303.
- Sharma AK, Vidyasagar K and Pathania NK. 2000. Studies on combining ability for earliness and marketable fruit yield in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 26: 54-61.
- Sharma P, Dhillon NS, Kumar P and Mehta P. 2019. Evaluation of parthenocarpic cucumber genotypes for fruit yield and its contributing traits under protected environment of N-W Himalayas. International Journal of Chemistry Studies 3: 04-06.
- Sharma P, Kaur M, Shilpa, Sharma A and Bhardwaj N. 2021. Breeding vegetables for protected cultivation: A review. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 47: 1-17.
- Sharma S, Kumar R and Sharma HR. 2017. Studies on variability, heritability and genetic gain in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Indian Journal of Ecology 44: 829-33.
- Singh Y, Safiullah, Verma A, Sharma S and Sekhon BS. 2017. Genetic evaluation of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) genotypes for yield and its contributing traits under mid-hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh, India. Environment & Ecology 35: 3621-3626